Bksb Subject Verb Agreement Answers

On the other hand, the subject-verb disagreement is simply the absence of this concordance. One way to look at this is to deny a case of concordance. Therefore, there is a disagreement in the number/plurality. The first places a singular verbage after a plural meeting. The second puts a plural veneer according to a singular subject. There is no standard that I know of, nor a simple solution that comes to mind for substantive-verb consistency in this case. For example, this solution makes sense, but complicated: “The added forms are made available to you to list the accounts you want to create.” This revision is better, but still unsatisfactory: “The attached form (or forms) will be made available to you to list the accounts you want to create.” In response to Gordon Havens` comment, my personal position is to make the agreement plural. The tank contains water, not liters, so “Ten liters of water are left in the tank” is correct. However, think about the efficiency of an active construction (for example.B. “The tank now contains ten liters of water”). Banks are the plural subject. What do banks do? Record them, so “register” is the bural associated with the plural size. What do they store? They store money, so “money” is the object.

The discussion “Answers to Questions about the Subject-Verb Agreement,” for example, No. 2, focused on the subject-verb concordance in the sentence “Ten liters of water are/remain in the tank.” 2. I`m in the scientific field and I`ve always written a kind of “ten liters of water”, and then I wondered if it was right to continue with a singular or plural book. I am not sure if the verb refers to liters or water. The subject of a sentence must correspond to the verb of the sentence: Paul finally showed us the right answer, I think, because he was actually talking about the subject-verb relationship. In fact, water is not the subject, it is “liters”. (Oh, and it`s subject / _Predicate_ Agreement) “Ten liters of water are in the tank.” Chalk and standards at table time. The diagrams show that the subject is the liter, the predicate is “is/are left” and the irreducible sentence becomes “Liters have remained”. The answers to how much, where and how serve to expand the sentence, but give no reason to destroy the agreement.. . .